Guido v. Duane Morris
(decision pending) In this legal malpractice action, was the defendant attorney entitled to summary judgment based on the client's prior agreement to settle the underlying litigation?
Guido v. Duane Morris
Klumpp v. Borough of Avalon
(decision pending) May a municipal occupy a property and obtain title through adverse condemnation without initiating condemnation proceedings under the Eminent Domain Act, N.J.S.A. 20:3-1 to 50?
Klumpp v. Borough of Avalon
IMO Phillip Boggia, judge of Municipal Court
(decision pending) Should a municipal court judge be disciplined when his two-attorney law firm in which he was a partner made a political contribution without his knowledge in the name of the law firm despite his verbal caution against doing so?
IMO Phillip Boggia, judge of Municipal Court
Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc.
Under the circumstances presented, does the attorney-client privilege protect this employee's email with her attorney sent through her personal, internet-based email account while using her employer-issued computer?
Syllabus
Substantive Brief
Fawzy v. Fawzy
Fawzy v. Fawzy - 199 N.J. 456 (2009) Questions whether parents can resolve custody and parenting time disputes using arbitration.
Fawzy v. Fawzy
Fernandez v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Fernandez v. Nationwide - 199 N.J. 591 (2009) Does an automobile insurer's right to reimbursement for paid personal injury protection benefits have priority over the insured's right to be made whole where the negligent driver's insurance does not fully cover the insured's personal injury damages?
Fernandez v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Hand v. Philadelphia Insurance Company
Hand v. Philadelphia Insurance Co. - 408 N.J. Super. 973 (App. Div. 2009) Whether a legislative enactment prohibiting "step-down" clauses in commercial automobile insurance polices should be retroactive.
Hand v. Philadelphia Insurance Company
Makroulakis v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Makroulakis v. Estate of Garcia - A-2800-07T2 (App. Div. 2009) Whether a legislative enactment prohibiting "step-down" clauses in commercial automobile insurance policies should be retroactive.
Makroulakis v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co.
Agha v. Feiner
Agha v. Feiner - 198 N.J. 50 (2009) At issue is whether the testimony of a physician qualified to interpret an MRI was required to establish that the MRI represented proof of a herniated disc, and, absent such testimony, whether the trial court was required to give a limiting instruction regarding the jury's use of the MRI.
Agha v. Feiner Final Brief
Brundage v. Estate of Carambio
195 N.J. 575 (2008) Whether plaintiff's attorney violated the Ruels of Professional Conduce by not disclosing knowledge of a pending appeal in a case confronting the same issue at the case at bar.
Brundage v. Estate fo Carambio
Jablonowska v. Suther
195 N.J. 91 (2008) Whether the verbal threshold applies to a person who has not sustained a bodily injury in an accident but who suffered emotional distress fro witnessing the death of a close family member
Jablonowska v. Suther
Olkusz v. Brown
401 N.J.Super 496 (App. Div. 2008) Whether a legislative enactment prohibiting "step-down" clauses in commercial automobile insurance policies should be retroactive.
Olkusz v. Brown
State v. Chun
194 N.J. 54 (2008) Concerning the reliability of the Alcotest 7110 MKIII-C in the prosecution of dui cases.
State v. Chun - Brief on Special Masters Report
State v. Chun - Reply Brief on Special Masters Report
State v. Chun - Brief on Supplemental Findings
State v. Chun - Reply Brief on Supplemental Findings
State v. Chun - Foundational Docs
State v. Chun - Motion to Enforce Court's Order
Davidson v. Slater
189 N.J. 166 (2007) Whether a person who has a pre-existing condition is required to provide a comparative analysis in order to satisfy the verbal threshold
Davidson v. Slater
Johnson v. Scaccetti
192 N.J. 256 (2007) Whether a person who has sustained one injury that satisfies the verbal threshold must prove that every other injury also satisfied the threshold
Johnson v. Scaccetti
Gac v. Gac
186 N.J. 535 (2006) Whether former husband was required to contribute towards child's educational expenses.
Gac v. Gac
In Re ACPE 697
188 N.J. 549 (2006) Whether it is a conflict of interest for a lawyer or another in the firm to represent both a municipal agency and a private client concurrently in the municipality's court or before any agency of the municipality.
In Re ACPE 697
In Re CAA Opinion 39
Whether the "Best Lawyers" and "Super Lawyers" advertising violates the rules governing attorney advertising
In Re CAA Opinion 39
In Re Peter Jacoby
188 N.J. 384 (2006) Whether there should be a perse suspension for an attorney convicted of domestic violence
In Re Peter Jacoby
Lewis v. Harris
188 N.J. 415 (2006) Whether comitted same sex couples are entitled to the same privileges and benefits as married couples
Lewis v. Harris
Brief
Liberty Mutual v. Land
186 N.J. 163 (2006) Whether preponderance of the evidence is the proper standard of proof under the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act.
Liberty Mutual v. Land
Pasqua v. Council
186 N.J. 127 (2006) Whether indigent parents charged with violation of child support orders have a right to appointed counsel
Pasqua v. Council
Banco Popular North America v. Gandi
184 N.J. 161 (2005) Whether New Jersey recognizes a casue of action for creditor fraud and whetehr any attorney may be liable for consipiracy under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act.
Banco Popular North America v. Gandi
Brunswick Hills Racquet Club v. Route 18 Shopping Center
182 N.J. 210 (2005) Whether covenant of good failth and fiar dealings voerns sophisticated commercial transactions.
Brunswick Hills Racquet Club v. Route 18 Shoping Center
DiProspero v. Penn
183 N.J. 477 (2005) Whether a person injured in an automobile accident is require to prove a serious impace on life in order to recover non-economic damages under the Automobile Insurance Reform Act
DiProspero v. Penn
Fischer v. Fischer
375 N.J. Super 278 (app. Div. 2005) Wheter wife's attorney could be required to return retainer as condition of withdrawal
Fischer v. Fischer
Jerista v. Murray
185 N.J. 175 (2005) Whether attorneys in a legal malpractice action should have been required to produce expert opinion as to the negligence of the alleged tortfeasor or whether they could have relied on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to create an inference of negligence.
Jerista v. Murray
LaManna v. Proformance Insurance Company
184 N.J. 214 (2005) Whether a statute that permits parties to stipulate that a majority of fewer than five-sixths of jurors may render a verdict is constitutional.
LaManna v. Proformance Insurance Company
Mani v. Mani
183 N.J. 70 (2005) Whether trial court could consider marital fault when awarding alimony and counsel fees.
Mani v. Mani
Puder v. Buechel
183 N.J. 428 (2005) Whether a client is bound by his representation to the trail court that a divorce settlement was acceptable and fair.
Puder v. Buechel
R.M. v. Supreme Court
185 N.J. 208 (2005) Whether a grievance filed against an attorney should remain confidential until a formal complaint has been filed.
R.M. v. Supreme Court
R.M. v. Supreme (Reply Brief)
State v. Williams
184 N.J. 432 (2005) Whether a mediator appointed by the court may testify in a subsequent criminal proceeding regarding a statement made by a participant during mediation.
State v. Williams
In re Keri
181 N.J. 50 (2004) Whether adult children who serve as legal guardians may transfer to themselves their parents' assets to hasten their parents' eligibility for Medicaid
In re Keri
Macedo v. Dello Russo
178 N.J. 340 (2004) Whether the Consumer Fraud Act applies to advertisements relating to the rendering of professional services.
Macedo v. Dello Russo
Weishaus v. Weishaus
180 N.J. 131 (2004) Whether the trial courts have the discretion in uncontested divorce actions to approve consensual support agrements without rendering findings as to marital lifestyle.
Weishaus v. Weishaus
In the Matter of Commitment of D.L.
Whether SVPA Litigants are constitutionally entitled to appoint counsel on appelas from commitment orders.
In the Matter of Commitment of D.L.
Starkey Kelly Blaney & White v. Estate of Nicolaysen
172 N.J. 60 (2002) Whether an attorney who enters into an unenforceable, oral contigent fee agreemetn is entitled to be paid a fee based upon quantum meruit.
Starkey Kelly Blaney & White v. Estate of Nicolaysen
In re Philadelphia Bar Association Request for Advisory Opinion
Seeks an opinion about whether a plan for shared office space meets the requirements of a bona fide office rule.
In re Philadelphia Bar Association Request for Advisory Opinion - CAA Submission
In re Philadelphia Bar Association Request for Advisory Opinion - Supreme Court Submission
In re Philadelphia Bar Request for Advisory Opinion - ACPES Submission
Archived Amicus Cases
